Jones (liquidator) v Matrix Partners Pty Ltd, re Killarnee Civil & Concrete Contractors Pty Ltd (in liq)  FCAFC 40 (Killarnee)
This paper was first presented on Wednesday, 21 March 2018 at The Sofitel, 25 Collins St, Melbourne for the Law Institute of Victoria.
Paper presented at Melbourne University, 12 October 2017.
This article was written at the request of and first published by LexisNexis in the September 2017 issue of the LexisNexis Internet Law Bulletin, volume 20, issue 6, pp 107-110
An analysis of whether parents can retain any equitable interest in property they have bought for their children.
While a solicitor has a primary duty to advance client interests, there is a paramount duty to the court not to do anything that interferes with the administration of justice.
A tragic tale of domestic violence required the Court to determine whether the forfeiture rule prevented the wife from inheriting the husband's estate.
Martin Scott QC and Matthew Townsend successfully represent Melbourne Health & the Department of Health and Human Services in VCAT
The Supreme Court has refused an application to modify a single dwelling covenant to allow a 21 apartment development in Thomastown
Choosing a lawyer for your application to either modify or remove a restrictive covenant can have considerable bearing on both the substantive outcome of the proceedings and costs.