In this paper, Jacob seeks to defend Hickman on its own terms, arguing that it is consistent with the modern jurisprudence on statutory interpretation. He then critiques the soundness of Plaintiff S157. Finally, Jacob argues a return to Hickman represents the best way in which to construe no-invalidity clauses.
'Gone But Not Forgotten: In Defence of Hickman' (2018) 46(2) Federal Law Review 259